CIPP-US新版題庫上線＆有保障的IAPP CIPP-US考試成功 -更新的CIPP-US測試題庫

順便提一下，可以從雲存儲中下載NewDumps CIPP-US考試題庫的完整版：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oa8hxdPUDUIOVwu0h23FbhvuQLTc8V1H

NewDumps 就是一個可以滿足很多參加 IAPP 的 CIPP-US 認證考試的IT人士的需求的網站，但是要想通過 CIPP-US 考試還需要大家認真理解。即使是IAPP 的 CIPP-US 擬真試題和真實考試中的差不多，建議大家考試的時候，還是要把題看清楚，不能完全按照 CIPP-US 擬真試題中的命令去做。要靈活運用，積極思考，不能死搬硬套。通過這個考試是需要豐富的知識和經驗的，而積累豐富的知識和經驗是需要時間的。

IAPP CIPP-US 認證考試是隱私專家想要提升事業並瞭解美國最新隱私法律法規時必不可少的認證方案。該考試具有挑戰性，但獎勵是值得的，因為它將為隱私專家提供他們在導航複雜的隱私法律法規世界中所需的知識和專業知識。憑藉 IAPP CIPP-US 認證，隱私專家可以展示他們對隱私的承諾和對場域中最新趨勢和發展的專注度。

CIPP/US認證考試由國際隱私專業人員協會（IAPP）管理，該協會是全球最大、最全面的全球信息隱私社群。該考試包含90道多項選擇題，涵蓋多個主題，包括美國隱私法律、規定和執行、隱私專業人員的角色和隱私程序的實施。通過考試的候選人將獲得CIPP/US認證，該認證有效期為兩年。

>> CIPP-US新版題庫上線 <<

CIPP-US測試題庫 - CIPP-US考試大綱

不同的方式是可以達到相同的目的的，就看你選擇什麼樣的方式，走什麼樣的路。很多人都想通過IAPP CIPP-US 認證考試來使自己的工作和生活有所提升，但是參加過IAPP CIPP-US 認證考試的人都知道通過IAPP CIPP-US 認證考試不是很簡單。有的人為了能通過IAPP CIPP-US 認證考試花費了很多寶貴的時間和精力卻沒有成功。

CIPP-US考試是針對在組織中從事隱私和數據保護角色的個人，包括隱私官員、合規官員、數據保護官員和信息安全專業人員的理想考試。該考試涵蓋四個主要領域：隱私法律和法規、隱私計劃治理、數據生命週期管理和隱私技術。通過考試的候選人展示了他們對隱私法律和法規的深刻理解，以及制定和實施保護個人信息的隱私政策和程序的能力。獲得CIPP-US認證對於希望建立隱私和數據保護方面職業生涯的專業人士來說是一個有價值的成就。

最新的 Certified Information Privacy Professional CIPP-US 免費考試真題 (Q183-Q188):

問題 #183
Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), what must a person who is denied employment based upon his credit history receive?

A. A list of rights from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
B. A prompt notification from the employer.
C. Information from several consumer reporting agencies (CRAs).
D. An opportunity to reapply with the employer.

答案：B

問題 #184
What role does the U.S. Constitution play in the area of workplace privacy?

A. It provides significant protections to federal and state governments, but not to private-sector employment
B. It provides enforcement resources to large employers, but not to small businesses
C. It provides legal precedent for physical information security, but not for electronic security
D. It provides contractual protections to members of labor unions, but not to employees at will

答案：A

解題說明：
The U.S. Constitution plays a limited role in the area of workplace privacy, because it mainly applies to the actions of the government, not private employers. The Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures1. The Supreme Court has interpreted this right to include a reasonable expectation of privacy in certain situations, such as in one's home, car, or personal belongings2. However, this right does not extend to private-sector employees, who are not protected by the Constitution from the actions of their employers, unless the employer is acting as an agent of the government3. Private-sector employees may have some privacy rights under state laws, common law, or contractual agreements, but these vary depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances4.
Public-sector employees, on the other hand, are protected by the Constitution from unreasonable searches and seizures by their employers, who are considered part of the government. Public-sector employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their workplace, unless there is a legitimate work-related reason for the search or seizure, such as to ensure safety, security, or efficiency. Public-sector employers must also comply with the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which prohibit the government from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or from denying any person the equal protection of the laws. These clauses protect public-sector employees from arbitrary or discriminatory actions by their employers that affect their employment status or benefits.
Therefore, the U.S. Constitution plays a significant role in the area of workplace privacy for federal and state governments, but not for private-sector employment, because it only regulates the actions of the government, not private actors. References:
* 1: Cornell Law School, Fourth Amendment, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution
/fourth_amendment
* 2: FindLaw, What Is a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy?, https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal- rights/what-is-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy.html
* 3: FindLaw, Workplace Privacy, https://www.findlaw.com/smallbusiness/employment-law-and-human- resources/workplace-privacy.html
* 4: Nolo, Privacy Rights of Employees, https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/privacy-rights- employees-29849.html
* : OPM, Employee Relations, https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/employee-relations/reference- materials/employee-privacy/
* : Cornell Law School, Fifth Amendment, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fifth_amendment
* : FindLaw, Public Employees and the Constitution, https://www.findlaw.com/employment/employment- rights/public-employees-and-the-constitution.html

問題 #185
What practice does the USA FREEDOM Act NOT authorize?

A. Emergency exceptions that allows the government to target roamers
B. The bulk collection of telephone data and internet metadata
C. An increase in the maximum penalty for material support to terrorism
D. An extension of the expiration for roving wiretaps

答案：B

解題說明：
The USA FREEDOM Act is a law that was enacted in 2015 to reform the surveillance practices of the U.S.
government. The law was a response to the revelations by Edward Snowden about the mass collection of phone records and internet data by the National Security Agency (NSA) under the authority of Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. The USA FREEDOM Act ended the bulk collection of telephone data and internet metadata by the NSA, and instead required the government to obtain a specific order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to access such data from the telecommunication providers. The law also authorized the following practices:
* Emergency exceptions that allow the government to target roamers: The law allows the government to temporarily target a non-U.S. person who is using a phone number or identifier of a U.S. person, without a court order, if there is an emergency situation that involves a threat of death or serious bodily harm.
The government must obtain a court order within seven days to continue the surveillance.
* An increase in the maximum penalty for material support to terrorism: The law increases the maximum prison term for providing material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization from 15 years to 20 years.
* An extension of the expiration for roving wiretaps: The law extends the sunset date for the roving wiretap provision of the USA PATRIOT Act, which allows the government to obtain a single order from the FISC to conduct surveillance on a target who switches devices or locations, without specifying the device or location. The law extends the expiration date from June 1, 2015 to December 15,
2019. References:
* USA FREEDOM Act
* USA FREEDOM Act Summary
* USA FREEDOM Act FAQs

問題 #186
Which of the following became the first state to pass a law specifically regulating the collection of biometric data?

A. Texas.
B. Washington.
C. Illinois.
D. California.

答案：C

解題說明：
Illinois became the first state to pass a law specifically regulating the collection of biometric data in 2008, when it enacted the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). BIPA defines biometric identifiers as retina or iris scans, fingerprints, voiceprints, or scans of hand or face geometry, and biometric information as any information based on biometric identifiers used to identify an individual. BIPA requires entities that collect, store, or use biometric identifiers or information to obtain informed consent from individuals, provide written policies on data retention and destruction, limit disclosure and sale of biometric data, and protect biometric data using reasonable security measures. BIPA also provides a private right of action for individuals whose biometric data is collected, stored, or used in violation of the law, and allows them to recover statutory damages of $1,000 or actual damages, whichever is greater, for each negligent violation, and $5,000 or actual damages, whichever is greater, for each intentional or reckless violation, as well as attorneys' fees and costs, and injunctive relief.

問題 #187
Federal laws establish which of the following requirements for collecting personal information of minors under the age of 13?

A. Affirmative consent of a parent or guardian before collecting personal information of a minor offline (e.g., in person), which also satisfies any requirements for online consent.
B. Implied consent from a minor's parent or guardian before collecting a minor's personal information online, such as when they permit the minor to use the internet.
C. Affirmative consent from a minor's parent or guardian before collecting the minor's personal information online.
D. Implied consent from a minor's parent or guardian, or affirmative consent from the minor.

答案：C

解題說明：
Explanation/Reference: https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/complying-coppa-frequently-asked- questions-0

問題 #188
......

CIPP-US測試題庫: https://www.newdumpspdf.com/CIPP-US-exam-new-dumps.html

BONUS!!! 免費下載NewDumps CIPP-US考試題庫的完整版：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oa8hxdPUDUIOVwu0h23FbhvuQLTc8V1H